9 Which Statement Is Not True Regarding Research With Animals White Man’s Religion? NOT Christianity!

You are searching about 9 Which Statement Is Not True Regarding Research With Animals, today we will share with you article about 9 Which Statement Is Not True Regarding Research With Animals was compiled and edited by our team from many sources on the internet. Hope this article on the topic 9 Which Statement Is Not True Regarding Research With Animals is useful to you.

White Man’s Religion? NOT Christianity!

Christianity: a white man’s religion?

Martin Luther King referred to Sunday as “the most special day in America.”

Truer words were never spoken.

A few years ago I was preaching and, Lord, help me, my opening words were, “Look around. What do you see? I see a church full of white people.” Blacks, Hispanics, Asians and others… they had all been there, but we had holes in our net and we couldn’t contain them. Jesus said, “The kingdom of God is like a net, which catches ALL kinds of fish…” (Matthew 13:47) and that includes black, brown, red, yellow, Protestant and Catholic, young, elderly, male. and female.

As Americans, we often project an imperialist attitude that the rest of the world hates. Regarding American CHRISTIANS, I have often heard and read of third world pastors saying how they wish they had the money Americans raised to go on their “mission trips” so they could be better cared for. for their families and congregations. bibles and study tools, attend the seminar. Can we even imagine a group of half-naked primitives coming to our churches to share the latest “revelation” God had given their tribe? Yet we spend a fortune crossing the pond for these short-term “life-changing” (whose life?) mission experiences. Don’t get me wrong, I believe in missions, especially those aimed at helping the sick and children, but I’ve heard many stories from missionaries who admitted they didn’t think they made a difference in their mission trip, and from citizens who might have used instead a nice wholesome love offering.

I once taught a Sunday school class to a room full of mostly black African pastors, their small frames lost inside their oversized, outdated suits and ties. Between them, their congregations reached an area of ​​40,000 people. These humble people took notes, asked questions, hung on my every word. I don’t know about them, but for me, THAT was life changing! God bless those who were wise enough to fly these African pastors to the US so they could go home and teach those they already had relationships with (key word).

Regarding this so-called “white man’s religion”, it is true that some mistakenly believe that Christianity is a white man’s religion in the same way that others consider Islam to be a black man’s religion. People, Hosea 4:6 declares, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge…” Let’s try to KNOW the truth because the Scripture says, “they will know the Truth and the Truth will set you free.” (John 8:32). What you are about to read, I believe, will be very liberating.

THE TRUTH ABOUT OUR PREVIOUSNESS

Black Christianity did not begin in America with slaves converting to their master’s religion. Genesis 10 tells us where all races originate. Black ancestry is presented by families, languages, locations, and nations. The Bible tells us, in Genesis, that everything began with Adam and Eve. ALL! Genesis 2:7 tells us that Adam was created from the ground. Science has proven that we are all made of the same materials found on earth. The Hebrew word for Adam is Adahm, meaning “red” or “from the red earth.”

Yes, Adam was a black person!

After the flood, it was Noah and his children who populated the earth (Acts 17:26; Genesis 9:18,19). His sons were named Ham, Shem and Japheth. These names mean respectively Black, Dusky, and Bright, or “fair.” Biblical historians agree that Ham is the forefather of the black races – Mongoloids, Egyptians, Ethiopians, Canaanites and Indians. From Shem came the Jews, Arabs and Persians. From Japheth came the Greeks, the Caucasians, the Russians, the Indo-Europeans.

One black boy out of three? Well, we don’t know exactly how dark the other two’s pigment was, but is that possible? With God all things are possible. Face it, if YOU were the Supreme Creative Being, wouldn’t you get creative when you make people and animals?

Look around. Look in the mirror… God has been very creative. Medical research tells us that it IS possible to have children of very different colors, especially if one or both parents are dark-skinned, but it is impossible for a light-skinned person to produce a dark-skinned child. So for Noah to have fathered a “black” son, he or his wife had to have dark skin as well.

Logically speaking.

Noah’s son Ham, the father of the African and Negro races, had four sons… Cush, Mizraim, Put and Canaan, Genesis 10:6. Kush was the father of the Ethiopians (Gen 2:13; 10:6) and of the people living within Asia and Africa. Cush means “black” and Ethiopia means “man with a sunburnt face”. Jeremiah 13:23 says, “Can the Ethiopian change his skin…?”

Mizraim gave birth to the Egyptians and his name means “children of the sun”. Eventually, they even started worshiping him, but that’s another story. Ham is derived from the Egyptian name “Kam”, the strongest word in the Egyptian language for “black”. The book of Psalms refers to Egypt as “the land of Ham” (Ps 78:51; 105:23, 26. 27; 106:21,22). Put was the father of the nation of Libya, (Ezekiel 27:10; 38:5; Jer 46:9 and Nahum 3:9). Libya also means “black”.

Ham’s youngest son was Canaan, cursed by Noah in Genesis 9:20-26. Although we have all heard of Ethiopia, Egypt and Libya, strange how there is no Canaan today. Note: Contrary to the teaching of SOME, it was NOT the entire black race that was cursed, only the Canaanites, because of Canaan’s sin. They were the original inhabitants of Israel (1 Chr 4:40), but they no longer exist. My, how blessed they could be! Yes, there are long-term consequences for sin that affect our descendants.

Noah’s sons emigrated, spreading throughout the land: the people of Japheth in modern Europe, of Shem in the Middle East. Ham’s descendants went to southern Arabia, Africa and India. Cush had a son named Nimrod (Gen 10:10) who built the tower of Babel, as well as Erek, Akkad and Calneh near the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, the starting point of all civilization (Gen 10:10; 11:1).

The descendants of Kush founded the mighty Assyria, the builders of Ninevah.

The Bible gives no record of the genealogy of Put.

Ham’s descendants included Menelik, a descendant of the Queen of Sheba and King Solomon, to whom Ethiopians trace their historical roots.

Joseph married an Egyptian woman (Genesis 41:50-52), so his sons, Manasseh and Ephraim definitely had Hamit (Black) blood.

Jethro was Ethiopian and converted to Judaism because of the testimony of Moses (Ex 18:1-12).

Moses was also married to an Ethiopian woman (Numbers 12:1). Was she black? It can be! In Numbers 12, Miriam and Aaron began to oppose Moses because of his Cushite (Ethiopian) wife, showing contempt for her ancestry. This angered God and Miriam was stricken with leprosy (interestingly, this disease would not only make MIRIAM outcast from the community, but her skin turned REALLY white as a result of the disease. Poetic justice? After Moses was pray on her behalf, God healed her and returned her to the camp). NOTE: I think Miriam’s REAL problem was not so much with Moses’ wife as it was with his prophetic gift and his special relationship with God. Perhaps she strove for the obvious (Miriam’s stone) instead of humbling herself and admitting to Moses how she envied him.

Scripture shows no prohibition against the Jews marrying the Kushites (Ethiopians) and they seem to have had good relations with them (Amos 9:7; Ps 68:31; Zeph 3:10; Is 11:11).

Yehudi was a secretary in the king’s court during Jeremiah’s time and was a descendant of Cush (Jer 36:14,21,23) as was the prophet Zephaniah.

From Ham’s lineage came Joshua and David’s grandmother, Rahab, a Canaanite. Bath-Sheba means “daughter of Sheba”. Sheba is listed in Ham’s family record, Genesis 7.

Bathsheba was married to Uriah the Hittite, whose roots can be traced back to Ham’s grandson, Heth (Genesis 10:15). King Solomon’s skin and hair are described as black but beautiful (Song of Solomon 5:10,11).

Going back to New Testament times, scholars believe that the wise men who sought out the baby Jesus (there is no biblical record that there were only three) were Ethiopians because gold, frankincense, and myrrh were abundant in southern Arabia and East Africa.

The Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8:26-39 undoubtedly brought Christianity to Ethiopia.

Simon the Canaanite was considered a black apostle (Matthew 10:4).

Simon of Cyrene, who helped Jesus carry His cross, was probably a descendant of Camus since Cyrene was in North Africa.

Apollos (Acts 18:24) also came from Camus. Of course, the nations that came from Camus were there at Pentecost (Acts 2) with the founding of the Church.

Simeon, or Niger, and Lucius of Cyrene were leaders of the Church of Antioch (Acts 13:1). The people of these regions were black. These were the men who ordained and ordained the great apostle Paul.

JESUS: The Man of Many Colors

Jesus was of mixed ancestry. You heard that right… Jesus was nauseous! Our Lord was a black person! Although He was primarily Semitic, of the five ladies mentioned in His genealogy, Tama, Rahab, Ruth, Bathsheba, and Mary, the first four came from Ham, the Black son of Noah (Matthew 1:1-16).

Let’s face it, people, man looks on the outside, but God looks on the heart (1 Sam 16:7). It doesn’t matter if you’re green with orange spots! He is not looking for complexion or physical features. He is not impressed by what we look like, how we talk or where we live. He doesn’t care how religious we are or how beautiful our church is. He doesn’t care how we dress, drive or what denomination we claim.

You see, there was no room in the inn when our Savior was born, and now He is looking into our hearts, regardless of our epidermal complexion, to see if there is room there for Him to rule each individual’s life as God.

Regardless of what color our epidermis may be, the question we must answer is: are we available?

Do you need pastoral counseling and prayer? Write or text me at team1min@aol.com

Every blessing!

Video about 9 Which Statement Is Not True Regarding Research With Animals

You can see more content about 9 Which Statement Is Not True Regarding Research With Animals on our youtube channel: Click Here

Question about 9 Which Statement Is Not True Regarding Research With Animals

If you have any questions about 9 Which Statement Is Not True Regarding Research With Animals, please let us know, all your questions or suggestions will help us improve in the following articles!

The article 9 Which Statement Is Not True Regarding Research With Animals was compiled by me and my team from many sources. If you find the article 9 Which Statement Is Not True Regarding Research With Animals helpful to you, please support the team Like or Share!

Rate Articles 9 Which Statement Is Not True Regarding Research With Animals

Rate: 4-5 stars
Ratings: 3191
Views: 45901664

Search keywords 9 Which Statement Is Not True Regarding Research With Animals

9 Which Statement Is Not True Regarding Research With Animals
way 9 Which Statement Is Not True Regarding Research With Animals
tutorial 9 Which Statement Is Not True Regarding Research With Animals
9 Which Statement Is Not True Regarding Research With Animals free
#White #Mans #Religion #Christianity

Source: https://ezinearticles.com/?White-Mans-Religion?-NOT-Christianity!&id=57009